In a FT's article, it is reported that Julia Holtz, the company’s senior competition counsel for Europe said the algorithm was a mechanical tool for ranking according to relevance. ”The algorithm does the ranking, not us,” she said, adding that companies had to “work on a good page to go up in the rankings”.
Since (grosso modo) distortion of competition is appreciated according to its effect on a given market and not according to the company's intent, the 'robot excuse' (i.e. 'it's not me, it's my algorithm') will remain unconclusive. In absence of other arguments, there is a high risk of conviction.
Microsoft learnt in 2009 that being an eGoliath in the EU is not an easy task. Now comes the turn of Google.
No comments:
Post a Comment